Singles Connection
FEATURES
My Berlin diary...
J.A.V.A. show energizes arts scene
New life for shul
COMMUNITY
Eight crazy nights of latkes and lights
Fountain Hills synagogue celebrates first bat mitzvah
Resigning in protest
HEALTH
Health agency to open new office
NATION
G.A. focuses on federation image
Powell visits Israel, Sharon wins key vote
WORLD
Holocaust survivors fete French town
MIDEAST
Israel is keeping a wary eye on Iran
OPINION
Editorial - A question of conscience
Commentary - We cannot stand idly by
Your Voice - Sudan: The silence is so deafening
In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
ARTS
'Kantormania' strikes Austrian town
BUSINESS
Where are the best places?
People on the move
COMING UP
This Week
MILESTONES
Births
B'nai Mitzvah
Obituaries
EDUCATION
Day schools celebrate writing week
TORAH STUDY
Reunion fails to achieve unity
Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

November 26, 2004/Kislev 13 5765, Vol. 57, No. 13

Israel is keeping a wary eye on Iran

RON KAMPEAS
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
WASHINGTON - For Israel, it's the classic "I've got good news, but you might want to hear the bad news first" scenario.

Just when a confluence of unrelated events revived the prospect of peace talks with the Palestinians, Iran's potential nuclear threat to the Jewish state suddenly seems greater than ever.

In fact, the Iran dilemma is almost the mirror image of new hope with the Pale-stinians: The prospect of a nuclear-armed, radical Isla-mic regime suddenly has moved from the "within years" to the "within months" column, differences between the United States and Europe are dogging resolution - and the United States wants Israel to just sit still.

Reports of Iran's accele-rated development of nuclear material, as well as missiles to deliver it, have profoundly unsettled Israelis.

"We believe we know what the real intentions of the Iranians are," Foreign Mini-ster Silvan Shalom said last week in Cleveland at the General Assembly of the United Jewish Communities, the umbrella group of North American Jewish federations. "The real intention of the Iranians is to develop a nuclear bomb."

The level of agreement over keeping at bay a nation that routinely calls for Israel's elimination and glorifies suicide bombers reached across Israel's otherwise fractious political culture.

"Israel cannot, cannot live under the shadow of nuclear Iran and the bomb," Ephraim Sneh, a leader of the opposi-tion Labor party, said on CNN.

"Israel is very vulnerable," said Sneh, who was in Wash-ington last week. "All our economic and intellectual assets are concentrated in a piece of 20 and 60 miles. That's all. Two bombs can turn Israel into a scorched Third World country. We cannot live with it."

Israel and the United States were hoping the Inter-national Atomic Energy Agency would announce tougher measures including more rigorous international monitoring and a trigger mechanism that auto-matically would refer any violation of Iran's non-proliferation agreement to the U.N. Security Council for sanctions.

Mindful of the IAEA meeting, the Iranians signed an agreement last week with France, Germany and Britain to temporarily suspend their uranium enrichment efforts.

Iran announced on Nov. 22 that the suspension, in effect until Iran works out a long-term agreement with the international community, is now underway.

Instead of assuaging con-cerns, however, the agree-ment underscored skepticism about Iran's intentions. Within days of signing the agreement, a reliable oppo-sition group said Iran was using advanced technology to enrich uranium at military sites and keeping the activity secret, presumably to exempt it from the suspension.

The National Council of Resistance of Iran also said that the country had pur-chased enriched uranium in 2001 and designs for nuclear warheads in the mid-1990s.

Iran dismissed the claims out of hand, but on Nov. 19 European diplomats - some apparently from the same nations that had negotiated the suspension agreement - were telling reporters that Iran was accelerating en-richment ahead of the suspension.

The diplomats were furious with the obvious effort to get Iran as close as possible to weaponization before the freeze kicks in.

President Bush said he found the allegations cre-dible. Attending a meeting of Pacific Rim leaders in Chile Nov. 20-22, Bush said he considered the reports a "very serious matter."

Another area of concern for the Americans is the devel-opment of missiles needed to deliver the warheads.

"I have seen some in-formation that would suggest they had been actively working on delivery systems," U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said last week.

Iran dismisses the reports as unfounded and compares them to the erroneous in-telligence on weapons devel-opment that helped draw the United States into war with Iraq.

"The burden of proof is on the shoulder of the person who makes the claims," Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said Nov. 22 in an interview on CNN.

The problem with that explanation is that Iran often is the source of the claims. In August, Iran released photos of a new version of its Shihab missile that had a baby-bottle design, as opposed to the usual cone shape.

The design apparently was drawn from Soviet era ICBM nuclear missiles, said Patrick Clawson, an Iran expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, since a nuclear device fits better in a baby-bottle shape.

Why would the Iranians allow the release of those pictures?

"They want people to know," Clawson said.

With Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein out of the way, flex-ing muscles sends a message that Iran is now a dominant power in the Middle East. That would allow Iran to continue its disruptive involvement in Lebanon, where Israel says Iran has armed Hezbollah terrorists with 13,000 missiles. Hezbollah and Iran also have emerged among the main financiers of Palestinian terrorist attacks in the West Bank.

The revelations late last week only increased skepti-cism among some on the 35-member IAEA board, and the United States has expressed its determination to impose stiffer standards, especially since Iran reneged on pre-vious deals.

"Iran is intensely working to marry its nuclear and missile programs so that it can deliver a nuclear weapon at the earliest possible date," said Andrew Schwartz, a spokesman for the American Israel Public Affairs Com-mittee. "Nothing in the agreement stops Iran from completing nuclear warhead designs or improving its missiles to enable them to deliver nuclear weapons."

After this meeting, Bush likely would raise the threat of sanctions when the IAEA board meets again, in about four months.

Israel, meanwhile, is sitting on its hands, not wanting to upend delicate U.S. efforts to build international support. U.S. officials have made clear they do not want Israel to repeat its successful 1981 strike on the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak.

"I don't see how it would do anything but provoke ... a conflict between Israel and Iran, and we want to avoid that at all costs, and I think the Israelis recognize that," Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said Nov. 21 on NBC's "Meet the Press."


Home