Singles Connection
FEATURES
Book bonanza
On the cutting edge
Religion comes first
COMMUNITY
Senate hopefuls talk
Jewish voters weigh options
EVJCC breaks ground
Celebrate 350 opens
Search continues for senior center site
PROFILE
Rabbi Shmuley explains away fear
SPORTS
Local qualifies for golf team
NATION
Candidates eye Israel
Advisers talk Middle East strategy
UCLA launches Israel program
Progressive Zionists
WORLD
Kabbalist takes over
The oldest family in the world
ISRAEL
Sharon wins vote, could lose government
Quiet anniversary
Economic initiative
OPINION
Editorial - Vote for able leader
Commentary - Kerry flunks reality test
Commentary - GOP leaves moderate cold
Commentary - What would Kerry do?
Commentary - It's not just about Israel
Commentary - Is it trick or treat?
In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
ARTS
AJTC gets 'Lost in Yonkers'
BUSINESS
Ditch the comfort zone
People on the move
COMING UP
This Week
MILESTONES
Births
B'nai Mitzvah
Engagements
Weddings
Anniversaries
Obituaries
EDUCATION
Coalition, students push for study in Israel
Conference aims to raise spiritual children
TORAH STUDY
Life isn't fair
Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

October 29, 2004/Cheshvan 14 5765, Vol. 57, No. 9

What would Kerry do?

GLENN HAMER
Let's imagine a President John Kerry.

A President Kerry would permit Iran to build nuclear weapons. Israel considers a nuclear Iran the biggest threat facing Israel today. President George W. Bush speaks of Iran as part of an "Axis of Evil." Kerry has promised to give Iran nuclear fuel as a gesture of good faith.

Kerry would bring Yasser Arafat back to the White House. Arafat visited the White House more than any other leader - friend or foe - during the Clinton years. Under Bush, Arafat is barred from the White House. It is reasonable to believe that he would return to Washington under a Kerry presidency, particularly since his campaign is now dominated by former Clinton staffers.

Kerry spoke out against Israel's security fence before his political advisers convinced him to change his position. Bush has not lifted a finger to pressure the Sharon government to stop construction, and has accepted widespread condemnation from Europe and the Arab world for his position.

Kerry believes removing Saddam Hussein from Iraq was a "colossal mistake." Hussein, you may recall, sent missiles into Israel and seriously threatened the use of poison gas against Israeli Jews.

Kerry would end Bush's pre-emption doctrine - the Israeli version of which saved the nation from elimination in the 1967 War.

Kerry would weaken the Patriot Act, which has been used effectively to shut down radical Islam fund-raising networks in the United States and to prevent additional terrorist attacks from occurring here.

Kerry would appoint people like former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker to facilitate peace. Would we really prefer this team to the pro-Israel Dream Team of Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith, Abrahms and Bush himself?

Kerry would vote for a stronger role for the blame-Israel-first United Nations and seek approval of Europe's Arafat-appeasers to decide the fate of Israel's negotiations with its neighbors. Kerry's proud embrace of Germany, France and the United Nations does not augur well for Israel.

Despite these contrasting records, recent polls suggest nearly 80 percent of Jewish voters will vote for the Kerry-Edwards ticket.

If true, this will demonstrate that the American Jewish community considers too many other issues more important than the safety and security of Israel. The Jewish community should recognize and reward the Bush administration's extraordinary efforts to protect not just the United States but Israel as well.

Glenn Hamer was a legislative assistant to U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., and chief of staff to former Congressman Matt Salmon, R-Ariz. He lives in Scottsdale.


Home