Get on TheList!
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     Reigniting sparks of Judaism
     Munich massacre remembered
     Community connection
COMMUNITY
     Death, dignity, obligation
     King David School opens new campus
     Preparing for Days of Awe
SPECIAL SECTION
High Holiday Planner

     Not your grandmother's honey cake
HEALTH
     Going to the mat for God
NATION
     Bush targets Kerry's Jewish support
     Republicans promise detailed platform
     Anti-mob law fights terror
     President Bush takes on Jewish issues
WORLD
     Synagogue donor among Russian crash victims
     Students help repair cemeteries
     Holocaust survivors' champion dies at 78
ISRAEL
     French Jews make aliyah
OPINION
     Editorial - Enter the debate
     Commentary - Bar Kochba no role model
     Commentary - Nader's public view painfully narrow
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
ARTS
     A new look at the Old World
BUSINESS
     When in doubt, show some teeth
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     Births
     B'nai Mitzvah
     Engagements
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
EDUCATION
     JCC opens Parent Center
TORAH STUDY
     Children need love, limits, involvement

Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

August 27, 2004/Elul 10 5763, Vol. 55, No. 49

Enter the debate

Editorial

So what role should American Jews play in Israel?

The flap over the Union of Reform Judaism's recent resolution on peace and security in Israel puts the issue squarely on the table.

An Aug. 6 story in The Forward (later corrected and reissued) with a headline trumpeting URJ's disappointment with U.S. policy not only highlighted the controversy but also the need for serious consideration of our responsibilities as Israel's supporters - and as her critics.

That two roles at times may be mutually exclusive was pointed out by the heated response to a letter URJ's Rabbi David Saperstein sent to U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell outlining URJ's support of the Gaza pullout but lamenting the lack of simultaneous U.S. resolve to push for a return to the negotiating table. The letter also condemned Palestinian terror while expressing distress for "the troubling humanitarian conditions of the Palestinians."

The Forward reported on the Saperstein letter, then fielded reactions from a host of prominent Jews, including Anti-Defamation League's Abe Foxman, who asked, "Who is America supposed to push Sharon to negotiate with?" and Zionist Organization of America's Mort Klein, who called the URJ criticism unjust.

As the maelstrom erupted, both Saperstein and Rabbi Eric Yoffie, URJ president, defended the action of the organization, which speaks for 1.5 million Reform Jews.

Which raises the question, "Can we be Israel's most ardent advocates and its most constructive critics?" The answer is a qualified "yes."

Yes, when we formulate consensus positions based on thorough study and deliberation. The URJ resolution was conceived through a process of careful analysis and ratified by its 1,000-congregational member representative body.

Yes, when our intent is to engender reasoned discourse, healthy debate and ultimate positive change. Just take a look at the comments in The Forward article and our own letters to the editor.

And yes, when our purpose is to educate and inform.

Rather than chastise the URJ for its forthrightness, we will do well to persuade other national groups to engage in the debate. The URJ action is a call for open, honest - and yes, heated -discussion, from the pulpit, in the classroom, in the boardroom.

With the High Holiday season approaching, what better topic to engage us than the future of the Jewish state - and our role in assuring its strength, security and prosperity?


Home