Singles Connection


Singles Connection
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     A tour of Jewish San Diego
     Coronado: a sizzling summer escape
     Hebrew hoopsters
COMMUNITY
     A model of interfaith relations
     Former Valley rabbi honored in Rome
     Awaiting a 90-day notice
     JFCS names new CEO
HEALTH
     Know your Jewish genetic disorders
     Interfaith issues complicate infertility
NATION
     Clinton self-proclaimed failure
     House backs Bush pledge to Israel
WORLD
     Lubavitcher rebbe's legacy lives on
     U.N. conference discusses growth of anti-Semitism
ISRAEL
     Will Labor join govt.?
OPINION
     Editorial - Changing Jewish lives
     Commentary - Winning the lottery
     Commentary - Making progress in the war on campus
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
ARTS
     Readers make choice summer picks
BUSINESS
     Miracle Mile opens in Southern California
     Brown & Bain merges
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     Births
     B'nai Mitzvah
     Engagements
     Anniversaries
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
YOUTH
     Billy Crystal pens book
TORAH STUDY
     Assume the risks of responsibility

Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

June 25, 2004/Tamuz 6 5764, Vol. 56, No. 40

Making progress in the war on campus

MITCHELL G. BARD
Two years ago I wrote: "The plight of Jewish students on college campuses is desperate." I am happy to report that the siege has been broken.

Today, the pro-Israel students dominate debate and usually set the agenda. That is the good news. The bad news is that the number of students who are knowledgeable and involved remains precariously small, and the more insidious danger from anti-Israel faculty has been largely neglected.

The view that the campus is "on fire" remains prevalent largely because of some misleading commentaries in the press and continuing reference to a handful of extreme events on a limited number of campuses.

For example, the shouting down of former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Concordia University in Montreal is continuously cited even though it occurred two years ago, was an isolated incident even then, and hasn't been repeated.

Israel's detractors continue to hold rallies, launch divestment efforts, build "apartheid walls" and engage in guerilla theater, but these actions are annoyances rather than problems. Thanks largely to the members of the Israel on Campus Coalition (ICC) - an umbrella group of all the major organizations that work with students - students are better trained and organized than ever before.

Of the eight steps I outlined two years ago to win the war on campus, the ICC has implemented five and is working on two of the other three. The members are providing students with the information they need, training students in Israel advocacy, incorporating the campus into the community, continuing the birthright israel program and sharing information.

The ICC membership is not funding Jewish newspapers on campuses, could do a better job of putting speakers on campus, and is just beginning to respond to the faculty problem.

The speakers program could be dramatically improved if more funds were allocated and greater effort was made to coordinate speaking tours to maximize the effectiveness of the speakers and minimize the cost.

Today, many organizations sponsor speakers, who often go to the same campuses at nearly the same time. If a national strategy were adopted, a larger number of campuses could be covered and more students educated and inspired. In addition, speakers who are addressing community audiences need to be encouraged to visit colleges and high schools.

Greater emphasis also needs to be placed on graduate students. Students in professional schools - who will be our future leaders - have been neglected. While I was speaking to undergraduates at Stanford University and the University of Pittsburgh, the Palestinian Authority legal adviser was speaking to the law schools on those campuses.

We should not cede the education of graduate students to the enemy.

If there is a general guiding the troops, it is Avraham Infeld, Hillel's dynamic new president. I know he does not see the campus as a battlefield in the same way that I do. Nevertheless, Hillel is the key player on campus and therefore Infeld's strategic decisions regarding Israel education will play a crucial role in determining how the war is fought, and whether it is won.

While great progress has been achieved in just two years, serious problems remain. Ignorance and apathy are two of the greatest impediments to winning the long-term war for the campus. While today's activists are bright, informed, and passionate, they make up a tiny minority of the student population. The buzzword of the day for addressing the problem is "engagement," and long hours are spent discussing the best way to entice more students to take an interest in Israel.

One of the most distressing aspects of this effort is the suggestion by some campus professionals that we avoid talking about Israel altogether - or at least be careful not to appear too pro-Israel. This is a potentially catastrophic error; the focus must be on educating young Jews and non-Jews about the history of Israel rather than suggesting it is all right for students to have misguided views based on ignorance.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has begun to educate students on a handful of campuses with its new CORE program, but much more needs to be done to provide students with the basic knowledge they need to develop informed opinions about issues related to Israel.

By the time students get to college, however, it's very late to be first learning the aleph-bet of Jewish history. The education process needs to begin in high schools, if not before.

Recognizing this, the Jewish National Fund has begun a project with high schools, and the American Jewish Committee and the Solomon Schechter High School of New York have developed the IKAR program promoting Israel Knowledge, Advocacy and Responsibility.

The pro-Israel community needs to make a stronger commitment to insure that students in Hebrew schools, day schools and even public schools learn modern Israeli history and, ideally, are also trained in advocacy techniques.

One other positive development has been a greater effort to collect data about student opinion toward Israel and the issues. This is an important trend that should continue; however, it needs to be done more carefully because some of the data that has been reported is questionable and has been misinterpreted.

Two years ago, I wrote that the community's top priority should be to endow chairs and establish centers for the study of Israel to provide an alternative to the Arab-funded professors and Middle East studies centers around the country that are teaching distorted views of Israel. Since then, Brandeis University and New York University have created centers and established chairs in Israel studies. Much more needs to be done.

The American-Israel Cooperative Enterprise and the ICC have just released a study I prepared, "Tenured or Tenuous: Defining the Role of Faculty in Supporting Israel on Campus," that outlines the scope of the problem with faculty and offers a series of recommendations for solving it. AICE is already implementing one by creating the Israel Scholar Development Fund to establish visiting Israel scholar programs and offer scholarships for doctoral students who write dissertations on Israel-related topics.

We are now winning most of the battles on campus, but we still have a lot of work to do to win the war.

Dr. Mitchell G. Bard is the author of 17 books including "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Middle East Conflict" and "Myths and Facts: A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict."


Home