Singles Connection


Singles Connection
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     Graduating seniors
     Keeping culture alive
     Longtime Phoenician recalls early days
COMMUNITY
     Happy birthday, Israel
     A community remembers
HEALTH
     Power of natural healing
NATION
     Kerry vies for Jewish vote
     ORT reaches out to America
     Learning tradition, eating locust
     Campaign rules
     Bush backs off
WORLD
     Polish stone for Cuba's Shoah memorial
     To learn from Holocaust
ISRAEL
     Sharon left with tough choices
     'Terminator' preaches tolerance
OPINION
     Editorial - Mazel tov, graduates
     Commentary - A few parting words
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
ARTS
     Arts series closes season
BUSINESS
     YLD looks to leaders
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     Births
     B'nai Mitzvah
     Engagements
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
YOUTH
     Be a better parent
TORAH STUDY
     Jewish women's decisive role

Get on TheList!
HOME PAGE

May 7, 2004/Iyar 16 5764, Vol. 56, No. 33

Campaign rules concern Jewish groups

RON KAMPEAS
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
WASHINGTON - A U.S. government bid to make clearer who supports and who opposes a political candidate could complicate the work of Jewish advocacy groups.

A wide range of national Jewish organizations - led by the Reform movement and the National Council of Jewish Women - have joined hundreds of other groups in protesting rule changes to campaign finance law that could go in effect May 13.

That's the deadline for comment on the rule changes, introduced March 11 by the Federal Election Commission, that would expand the definition of a political committee. Any group affected by the change would have to subject its fund raising to severely restrictive tax laws.

Of central concern to Jewish groups is language that would redefine as a political com-mittee any organization that spends money on material that "promotes, supports, attacks or opposes any clearly defined candidate for federal office."

"How could a religious organization advocate, on either side, on an issue of profound moral significance without addressing the appropriate legislation's sponsors and opponents, who are so often candidates for federal office?" Rabbi David Saperstein, the director of the Reform movement's Religious Action Center, asked in testimony last month before the FEC.

Another concern is a change that would allow groups that encourage voter registration to maintain non-political status only if "information concerning likely party or candidate preference has not been used to determine which in-dividuals to encourage to register to vote."

Most synagogue congre-gations are known to favor one party or the other, Saperstein said.

"Fully aware of these 'likely' voting preferences, religious groups could be deterred from registering even their own congregations to vote," he testified.


Home