Singles Connection


Get on TheList!
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     Secondhand, but not second-rate
     Social action
COMMUNITY
     STO tops $1.2 million
PROFILE
     Publicist driven by passion for arts
HEALTH
     Israel struggles with no-smoking laws
ELECTION 2004
     Candidates clarify stances
     Readers voice preferences
     Jewish support split three ways
NATION
     'Passion'
     U.S. folds up the road map
WORLD
     Nazi-experiment victims
ISRAEL
     Hezbollah prisoner-swap
OPINION
     Editorial - A vote for Joe
     Commentary - Peace posturing
     Commentary - Improved immigration policy
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
ARTS
     A portrait of betrayal
BUSINESS
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     Births
     B'nai Mitzvah
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
YOUTH
     Teen wants to help kids
TORAH STUDY
     A glorious vision then and now

Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

January 30, 2004/Shevat 7 5764, Vol. 56, No. 19

'Passion' may poison Christian-Jewish ties

JOE BERKOFSKY
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
NEW YORK - Jesus will appear on the Christian holy day of Ash Wednesday - thanks to Mel Gibson.

The Hollywood star directed and financed the $25 million epic "The Passion of the Christ," which is emerging from a nearly yearlong media storm and is due to hit 2,000 screens nationwide Feb. 25.

That Gibson's "The Pas-sion" will premier is certain. The big question is how a reportedly gory film about the last 12 hours in Jesus's life, in Aramaic and Latin with subtitles, will play at the local multiplex.

Many Jewish organizational leaders also are waiting to see if a movie they say scapegoats the Jews for the Crucifixion will produce legions of Jew-hating moviegoers and poison Christian-Jewish relations for years to come.

"It makes the Romans look like lambs who are being forced" to punish Jesus, "and it shows the Jews as blood-thirsty and vengeful and unending in their desire to see him crucified," Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said after emerging from a preview last week.

The movie debuts at a sensitive period in Catholic-Jewish relations. It also reflects a larger struggle within the Catholic Church over whether to continue promoting 40-year-old reforms that include renouncing the notion of collective Jewish guilt for Jesus' crucifixion, an issue Gibson apparently brings to the silver screen.

"Tied loosely to the film, there is enormous concern on both sides" of the Catholic-Jewish divide "about which direction the church will be going in the post-John Paul II era," said Rabbi Eugene Korn, a Seton Hall adjunct professor and longtime interfaith advocate.

Last week, some signs of hope about those ties surfaced in New York, where the World Jewish Congress hosted a two-day gathering that brought together 12 cardinals and six chief rabbis from nations as diverse as Angola and Ukraine with a group of Catholic and Jewish scholars.

The meeting was note-worthy not only for the unusual presence of leading papal contenders, but for the presence of top Orthodox Jewish figures as well.

WJC Chairman Israel Singer said that the conference helped "institutionalize" con-tacts that have warmed ever since the Vatican's 1965 reforms, known as Nostra Aetate, dropped the teaching that charged Jews with collective responsibility for killing Jesus.

But even as the interfaith talks took place, the Gibson movie continued to inflame new tensions.

David Elcott, director of interreligious affairs for the American Jewish Committee, also saw "The Passion" last week at one of the nation's largest evangelical churches, in a Chicago suburb.

The movie shows the Jews as a "mob spitting, scratching, yelling, pummeling" at Jesus, "their faces contorted," Elcott said. "This movie is an assault on our commitment to inter-religious dialogue and respect."

Running a public-relations campaign surrounding the film is a Christian group called Outreach, which runs a Web site promoting the movie and points to rave reviews from Christian clerics and Michael Medved, who is identified as a "Jewish film critic."

Meanwhile, even as the bishops met with rabbis in New York, and the pope met with two top Israeli rabbis last week, another dispute erupted over whether the pope himself endorsed the movie.

A Wall Street Journal columnist was the first to report that an Icon producer succeeded in getting a copy of the movie to the pontiff, who viewed it and, according to an unnamed Vatican source, said, "It is as it was."

Other reports echoed that account, but a senior Vatican aide to the pontiff later dismissed the report, saying the pope "does not give judgments on art."

Ironically, Gibson is a member of a Catholic fundamentalist sect that rejects Vatican authority and opposes its reforms, though Gibson has insisted he is not anti-Semitic.

Icon spokesman Alan Nierob dismissed any apparent contradiction between Gibson's opposition to the Vatican and Icon's apparent quest for the church's imprimatur.

"It's just a matter of building support," he said.

Some signs of goodwill have cropped up in the past year related to the movie.

Recently, the Center for Christian-Jewish Relations at Boston College, a liberal Jesuit institution, issued "Facts, Faith and Film-making: Jesus' Passion and Its Portrayal," a guide intended to counter the film's potential impact.

At the same time, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued "The Bible, the Jews and the Death of Jesus," a collection of church papers intended to "end prejudices against Jews and Judaism."


Home