Singles Connection


Singles Connection
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     Expanding cultural awareness
     Achieving recognition
     What I did on my summer vacation...
COMMUNITY
     Reaching out in print
     East Valley Chabad moves
     Synagogue leases building
     Symposium seeks common ground
HIGH HOLIDAYS
     Places to pray on Rosh Hashana, Yom Kippur
NATION
     U.S. priorities
     Jews back asylum seekers
     Pollard finally has day in court
     Population study due soon
WORLD
     French envoy
     Sanford Solender
ISRAEL
     Orr report
     Israeli makes gains
     Israel's targeted killings
OPINION
     Editorial - A misuse of fear
     Commentary - Teshuvah demands preparation
     Commentary - Palestinians don't want peace
     Commentary - Israeli planes over Auschwitz
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
BUSINESS
     Mind Your Own Business - Business Calendar
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     B'nai Mitzvah
     Anniversaries
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
YOUTH
     Holidays offer perfect teachable moment
TORAH STUDY
     Perform mitzvot for their own sake

Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

September 5, 2003/Elul 8 5763, Vol. 55, No. 54

National Jewish population study due soon

JOE BERKOFSKY
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
NEW YORK - After nearly a year of controversy and delay, the 2000-01 National Jewish Population Survey - billed as the most comprehensive study ever of U.S. Jewry - is due to be made public next week.

The release comes nearly 10 months after the study's sponsors halted its initial publication amid questions over methodology and findings.

Those questions sparked first an internal audit by the sponsor, the United Jewish Communities federation umbrella, and then an independent review, which also is scheduled to be released next week.

Slated to be among the study's key findings are the size of the U.S. Jewish population and its geographic spread, age and income, and birth and marriage rates.

The study also will reveal such identity-related issues as levels of Jewish education, philanthropy, movement and synagogue affiliation, and religious observance.

These findings could shape spending and programming policy for many Jewish federations and Jewish communal organizations in areas from Jewish camps to outreach to the intermarried.

The NJPS "will provide a picture of where we're at," said Paul Golin, spokesman for the Jewish Outreach Institute, which works on getting unaffiliated Jews more active.

Such large studies enable Jewish organizations to "step back and see whether what you're doing is having an impact."

Whether the extensive data the NJPS promises will help restore the study's tarnished credibility or whether con-troversy will continue to overshadow the results re-mains to be seen.

Steven Cohen, a Hebrew University sociologist and research consultant to the NJPS for the UJC, says the rich trove of data in the NJPS ultimately will prove its worth.

"Overall, I am convinced the results of this method-ologically difficult process are quite credible, believable and usable," Cohen said.

Stephen Hoffman, UJC's president and chief exe-cutive officer, told JTA he was confident the study has "full value."

"There have been some times, in the middle of the night, when I have thought about whether I took the correct course delaying release of the data last fall," he said. "But after seeing the quality of the data and the high degree of confidence surrounding it, I know that the decision was correct."

Egon Mayer, a City Uni-versity of New York sociologist and member of the National Technical Advisory Com-mittee, which consulted on the NJPS, agreed that researchers likely will mine a rich vein of data buried in the NJPS, but the typical Jew on the street may pay little attention to the results.

"Because there's been so much controversy over the methodology itself, no finding is going to have the authority of a major headline," Mayer said.

The 1990 NJPS made headlines chiefly because it found that more than half of Jews who had married in the previous five years had wed non-Jews.

That finding fueled public policy debates that continue to this day over whether communal dollars should be spent on reinforcing Jewish identity among those already active or on reaching out to Jews on the fringes of the community.

Despite debate even over the validity of the 52 percent intermarriage conclusion, Mayer says, "there wasn't a global questioning of the whole study, which may or may not be warranted" in this case.

Yet in the world of Jewish demographics, many predict that the study's findings will emerge from the shadow of controversy.

Among them is another NJPS advisory committee member, Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami geography professor who has led dozens of studies of local Jewish communities.

"As people get into the data and see the wealth of data that's there and see the data is reasonable, the criticism is going to melt away," Sheskin said.

According to Cohen, the study can be analyzed on three levels, the "least robust" of which is the population estimate, because it was based in part on what he called assumptions of who is a Jew and in part on who responded.

According to the study's initial findings, which were released in October 2002, there were 5.2 million U.S. Jews, down about 5 percent from the 5.5 million found in 1990.

Others have challenged that number.

Gary Tobin, a vocal critic of the NJPS and president of the Institute for Jewish and Community Research in San Francisco, conducted a survey in September 2002 that found 6.7 million Jews, far higher than the NJPS or the 6.1 million that came from local studies for the 2001 American Jewish Year Book.


Home