Singles Connection


Singles Connection
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     Letting kids be kids
     MAZON
     Chicago writer
VALLEY
     Hundreds mark rally
     Beth Joseph honors teens
NATION
     What unites Arabs, Jews
     State Dept. blasts Israel
     Stem cell decision
     Durban
WORLD
     Remember the Wall
ISRAEL
     Bomber
     Palestinian HQ
OPINION
     Editorial - Seeking common ground
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
     Commentary - Outrageous notions
     Latz - Monica and Chandra
ARTS
     Kaplansky couldn't escape
     Judaica sale
BUSINESS
     Personal chef
     Mind Your Own Business - Business Calendar
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     Births
     Weddings
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
TORAH STUDY
     The lofty vision of Jerusalem

Singles Connection
HOME PAGE

August 17, 2001/Av 28, 5761, Vol. 53, No.45

Letters to the Editor

August 17, 2001

Write to the Editor
Click Here

Barenboim presumptuous

Editor:
Pauline Dubkin Yearwood of the Chicago Jewish News writes in "Decision to play Wagner in Israel sparks debate" (Jewish News, Aug. 3) the following about the controversy over Daniel Berenboim's playing Richard Wagner in Israel: "Many say they can see arguments on both sides of the issue." Briefly stated, Berenboim had agreed to leave Wagner's music off the program and then, he played the prelude to Tristan and Isolde as an encore.

I feel that both parties missed the fundamental point, which I see as personal opinions being forced on others in the names of self-righteous causes. In this case, it was a crusade for Wagner's music. Even for the sake of artistic freedom, an opinion, forced on others, is still intolerance.

Berenboim's encore was pre-planned and the deception deliberate. Just like Hitler at the Nuremberg Reichstag in 1935, he had a surprise for them.

I find it presumptuous.

Martin I. Selling
Phoenix




Tithe, make rebate moot

Editor:
In Barry Cohen's column about the tax credit, "Finding a better use of our rebate" (Jewish News, Aug. 3), he recommends that we give our tax refund to charity.

While I agree that is a nice sentiment, I disagree that the rebate somehow steals from the poor to provide extra benefits to the wealthy.

If one tithed on gross income as the Torah commands, then this tax rebate would be a true rebate, that is tax and tithe free, as each of us would have already paid both. If one then gave that additional money to charity, it would be a great mitzvah.

It is my belief that charity, giving of time and money, should be a daily act, whether the government gives me a rebate or not.

Harris Weisman
Scottsdale




'Virtual' neighborhoods

Editor:
The excellent article by Beth Olson, "Who is teaching our children?" (Jewish News, Aug. 3), speaks to the most important issue of educating our children. Our excellent day schools, including four elementary schools and two high schools, and the availability of the state scholarship funds provide wonderful choices for families to enrich the lives of their children and their families academically and Jewishly.

Day schools provide a strong knowledge base, an opportunity for extensive individual attention, foster a strong sense of identity and connect the student and family to the Jewish people.

Our day schools provide "virtual" Jewish neighborhoods of friends and connections in our valley of disparate and distanced homes. They are the setting in which our future leaders are being trained.

Elaine Schreiber,
Chairwoman, The Day School Consortium
Phoenix



Home