Singles Connection


Singles Connection
STORIES IN THIS ISSUE
FEATURES
     When death happens
     Tutor shares
     Foster homes
VALLEY
     Think tank
     Former Messianic
NATION
     U.S.-Israeli dynamic
     STAR
WORLD
     Film on Jewish divorces
ISRAEL
     Massive victory
     'Lesser evil'
     Arabs reject
OPINION
     Editorial - People's choice
     Analysis - Preserve the Earth
     In the Mail - Letters to the Editor
     Commentary - Don't yield
ARTS
     Richardson plays Gruber
     'Shylock'
     True war stories
BUSINESS
     Mind Your Own Business - Business Calendar
     People on the move
COMING UP
     This Week
MILESTONES
     Births
     B'nai Mitzvah
     Engagements
     Obituaries
SENIORS
     Events
SINGLES
     Datebook
YOUTH
     Chabad family retreat
     JCC preschool registration
TORAH STUDY
     Sea of Reeds

Singles Connection
Logo

February 9, 2001/Shevet 16, 5761, Vol. 53, No.19

People's choice

Editorial

"The voters have spoken, and I respect their democratic decision," conceded Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak after being roundly defeated in this week's elections.

By overwhelming numbers, Israeli voters rejected Barak and endorsed his successor, Gen. Ariel Sharon. The lowest voter turnout in Israel's history may mean that Sharon won simply by default, elected by an Israeli public too tired, too frustrated and too confused either to go to the polls or to marshal resistance to what many viewed as a foregone conclusion.

As the "situation" in Israel dragged into its fifth long month, with a mounting human toll, the prevailing sentiment was that anything is better than Barak. But even for those demoralized by the Sharon victory, there was some satisfaction in Israel's propensity for an orderly transition of power, a rarity in the incendiary region. This was an election, after all, a "democratic decision," not a coup.

And Sharon's reputation as a tough soldier may yet prove to be his vindication. He clearly appeals to the rightists, the religious and the Russians, and may be attractive to disaffected centrists as well. It remains to be seen whether that will be enough for him to form a viable coalition, if he fails to garner Labor support.

Too, even avowed peaceniks, tired of the violence and yearning for normalcy, may warm to Sharon's redefinition of peace, turning away from the idyllic vision of his predecessors to a hard-nosed view of coexistence. A welcome first step is Sharon's insistence that he will not negotiate with the Palestinians while violence, or the incitement to violence, continues.

Further, his aversion to arbitrary timetables that may feed unrealistic expectations, and his backtracking to a strategy of interim small steps rather than pushing for a comprehensive final agreement, may prove effective.

Finally, there is the comfort that if Sharon is unequal to the daunting challenges ahead, there will always be another election. After all, Israel is Israel.


Home